Analisis Semiotika Ruang Tamu Rumah Panggung Masyarakat Bugis Baranti

Authors

  • Munarsi M Program Studi Arsitektur, Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Auditha Nurul Gamalia Program Studi Arsitektur, Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Hariyadi Salenda Program Studi Arsitektur, Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/ruang.v19i1%20Maret.222

Abstract

This research examines the expression of space in the stilt houses of the Bugis community in Baranti District, focusing on the interior elements of the living room.The living room in the Bugis stilt house not only functions as a functional space but also serves as a medium to express the social status and cultural identity of the homeowners.This study uses a semiotic approach with Peirce's trichotomy theory to analyze the signs on the interior elements of the living room that reflect the social, cultural, and status symbols of the homeowners.The signs found are divided into two main categories, namely collective signs that reflect shared social values (such as religious symbols, pilgrimage status, and family identity) and individual signs that reflect the personal expression of the homeowner, influenced by aesthetic preferences and socio-economic background.The research results show that noble houses tend to retain traditional elements that have deep philosophical and cultural meanings, such as the use of Jepara carved chairs and family lineage documentation photos, which serve as symbols of high social status.On the other hand, the homes of ordinary people use interior elements to express social status achieved through personal accomplishments, such as collections of educational photos and collections of cups that indicate hajj status.

References

Akbar, A. M., Yudono, A., Wikantari, R., & Sir, M. (2019). Concept of Form and Space in Buginese Aristocratic

Traditional House in Bone South Sulawesi. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15, 865-868.

doi:10.36478/jeasci.2020.865.868.

M, M., & Wijono, D. (2020). Semangat Reso Dalam Rumah Panggung Bugis Saoraja Masa Sekarang. Talenta

Conference Series: Energy and Engineering (EE), 3. doi:10.32734/ee.v3i1.874

Septriani, R. (2021). Pengaruh Mebel Klasik dalam Interior Ruang Tamu Rumah Tinggal terhadap Pilihan Desain

Mahasiswa Desain Interior. LINTAS RUANG: Jurnal Pengetahuan dan Perancangan Desain Interior, 8, 31-41.

doi:10.24821/lintas.v8i1.4903

Ibrahim, M., & Ashadi, A. (2020). Kajian Konsep Arsitektur Semiotik Pada Bangunan Gedung Pertunjukan. Jurnal

Arsitektur ZONASI, 3, 272-281. doi:10.17509/jaz.v3i3.25018

Abidah, A. (2017). Symbols of Social Strata Border in Traditional House Architecture (Case Study: Saoradja

Lapinceng and Banua).

Akbar, A. M., Yudono, A., Wikantari, R., & Sir, M. (2024). Territorial Characteristics of the Tamping Room of the

Buginese Traditional Houses: Insights from the Aristocrats House in Bone, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.

International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements e-journal, 11, 110-121.

doi:https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2024-11-12-08

Nasruddin, N. (2020). Haji Dalam Budaya Masyarakat Bugis Barru: Suatu Pergeseran Makna. Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu

Agama, 3, 158-173. doi:10.37329/kamaya.v3i2.438

Moedjiono. (2011). Ragam hias dan warna sebagai simbol dalam Arsitektur Cina. MODUL, 11, 17- 22.

Yin, R.K. (2011). Qualitative reseach from start to finish. New York: The Guilford Press.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotic the basics. Prancis: Routledge.

Additional Files

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

Munarsi M, Auditha Nurul Gamalia, and Hariyadi Salenda. 2025. “Analisis Semiotika Ruang Tamu Rumah Panggung Masyarakat Bugis Baranti”. RUANG : JURNAL ARSITEKTUR 19 (1 Maret):25-33. https://doi.org/10.22487/ruang.v19i1 Maret.222.