Aspek Keberlanjutan Dalam Konsep Arsitektur Biomimikri, Biomorfik Dan Arsitektur Ekologis

Authors

  • Muhammad Dwi Utomo Prodi Pascasarjana S2 Arsitektur, Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Moh Yusuf Program studi magister arsitektur
  • Puteri Fitriaty Jurusan teknik arsitektur, Universitas tadulako
  • Andi Jiba Rifai Bassaleng Jurusan teknik arsitektur, Universitas tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22487/ruang.v19i1%20Maret.206

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between biomimicry, biomorphic, and ecological architecture, and aims to determine whether biomimicry and biomorphics can be categorized into ecological architecture. Biomimicry architecture mimics nature's shapes, systems, and mechanisms to create efficient and sustainable designs, while biomorphic architecture focuses more on nature-inspired organic aesthetics and forms. This study uses a descriptive-comparative approach, analyzing the basic principles of the three architectural approaches based on the theory developed by Frick (2007) about the principles of ecological architecture. The results show that biomimicry architecture is very much in line with the principles of ecological architecture, especially in terms of energy efficiency and sustainability, with a high average score. In contrast, biomorphic architecture is more aesthetically oriented and tends to meet sustainability criteria less, although it still contributes positively to the experience of the space. The study concludes that biomimicry architecture can be classified as part of ecological architecture, while biomorphic is more complementary in aesthetic aspects.

References

K. Firly, Wiwik, and I. Suparno, “PENERAPAN EKOLOGI ARSITEKTUR Pada Pengembangan Kawasan Desa Wisata Dukuh Kajongan Kota Tegal,” 2019.

F. Mathews, “Towards a deeper philosophy of biomimicry,” Organ Environ, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 364–387, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1086026611425689.

S. Fatima Almatisha, R. Ayu Puspatarini, P. Studi Arsitektur, F. Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, and U. Trisakti, Prosiding Seminar Intelektual Muda #2, Peningkatan Kualitas Hidup dan Peradaban Dalam Konteks IPTEKSEN. 2019.

J. M. Benyus, “Fiche de lecture BIOMIMETISME QUAND LA NATURE INSPIRE DES INNOVATIONS DURABLES.”

Gehan. A. N. Radwan and N. Osama, “Biomimicry, an Approach, for Energy Effecient Building Skin Design,” Procedia Environ Sci, vol. 34, pp. 178–189, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.017.

N. Asyifa, Y. Firzal, and G. Faisal, “Kajian Biomorphic Architecture dalam Perancangan Oceanarium Pekanbaru,” ARSITEKTURA, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 277, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.20961/arst.v18i2.42634.

Sari and sholeh, “PERKEMBANGAN ARSITEKTUR BIOMORFIK HINGGA INTEGRASINYA TERHADAP PRINSIP ARSITEKTUR HIJAU,” vol. 13, p. 2022, 2022.

H. (-) Frick, Dasar-dasar arsitektur ekologis konsep pembangunan berkelanjutan dan ramah lingkungan, Seri Eko-Arsitektur. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.

B. S. Limenta, “Strategi Pengembangan Arboretum Berbasis Arsitektur Ekologis di Hutan Pinus Pracimantoro Wonogiri,” ARSITEKTURA, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 107, May 2021, doi: 10.20961/arst.v19i1.45448.

A. D. Utami, S. Yuliani, and U. Mustaqimah, “PENERAPAN ARSITEKTUR EKOLOGIS,” 2017.

E. Jamei and Z. Vrcelj, “Biomimicry and the built environment, learning from nature’s solutions,” Aug. 02, 2021, MDPI AG. doi: 10.3390/app11167514.

Y. Benyoucef and A. Razin, “BIOMIMICRY ARCHITECTURE, FROM THE INSPIRATION BY NATURE TO THE INNOVATION OF THE SAHARAN ARCHITECTURE,” Architecture and Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3–12, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.23968/2500-0055-2018-3-4-3-12.

V. A. Metallinou, “Ecological propriety and architecture,” in WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 2006, pp. 15–22. doi: 10.2495/ARC06002

https://www.learnbiomimicry.com/blog/top-10-biomimicry-examples-architecture

https://designwanted.com/johnson-wax-headquarters-frank-lloyd-wright/

https://www.idesignarch.com/lhemisferic-an-eye-catching-architectural-masterpiece-in-valencia/

Additional Files

Published

2025-03-07

How to Cite

Muhammad Dwi Utomo, Moh Yusuf, Puteri Fitriaty, and Andi Jiba Rifai Bassaleng. 2025. “Aspek Keberlanjutan Dalam Konsep Arsitektur Biomimikri, Biomorfik Dan Arsitektur Ekologis”. RUANG : JURNAL ARSITEKTUR 19 (1 Maret):1-8. https://doi.org/10.22487/ruang.v19i1 Maret.206.

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 1 Maret (2025): JURNAL RUANG

Section

Issue

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Dwi Utomo, Moh Yusuf, Puteri Fitriaty, Andi Jiba Rifai Bassaleng

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with Ruang: Jurnal Arsitektur agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.