Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Proces (AHP) untuk menentukan Kriteria Hutan Kota Fungsi Rekreasi untuk Masyarakat Perkotaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22487/ruang.v18i2%20September.189Abstract
Urban forests as green open spaces provide ecological, recreational, and aesthetic benefits. This study aims to determine the criteria for urban forests as recreational areas for urban communities. The steps taken include analyzing evaluation criteria and establishing standard criteria using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the weight of the criteria. The results of the calculations show that the component criteria obtained are management (%), urban forest objects (%), visitors (%), accessibility (%), visitor activities (%), facilities and infrastructure (%). Therefore, the highest criteria for urban forests with recreational functions are management, and the lowest criteria are infrastructure
References
Andkjær S, Arvidsen J. 2015. Places For active outdoor recreation – A Scopingreview. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. 12. 25–46.
Bestard AB, Fot AR. 2010. Estimating the aggregate value of forest recreation in a regional context. Journal of Forest Economics. 16: 205—216.
Douglass RW. 1970. Forest Recreation. Oxford. Peragon Press. New York.
Gunn CA. 1993. Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts, Cases. Washington: Taylor & Francis.
Hanson P dan Frank M. 2016. The Human Health and Social Benefits of Urban Forests. Dovetail Partners, Inc.
Kenney WA, Phillip JE, van Wassenaer, Satel AL. 2011. Criteria and indicators for drtategic urban forest planning and. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 37 (3): 108—117.
Konijnendijk CC. 2008. The Forest and the City: The Cultural Landscape of Urban Woodland. Denmark: Springer.
Lee ACK, Maheswaran R. 2010. The Health Benefits of Urban Green Spaces: aReview of the Evidence. Journal of Public Health. 33(2): 212—222.
Mann C, Pouta E, Gentin S, Jensen FS. 2010. Outdoor recreation in forest policy and legislation: A European comparison. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9: 303—312.
Muspiroh N. 2014. Pembangunan Hutan Kota Di Kota Cirebon. 3 (1): 49—62. Cirebon: Scientiae Educatia.
Northrop, Robert J, Beck K, Irving R, Landry SM, Andreu MG. 2013. City of Tampa Urban Forest Management Plan. Florida.
Nowosielski R, Spilka M, Kania A. 2007. Methodology and tools of ecodesign. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 23 (1): 91-94. Polandia: International OCSCO World Press.
Oo TZ. 2014. Analysis on the Condition of Recreation, Parks and Open Spaces in Yangon and RPOS‘s Role. 4 (5): 1—9. Myanmar: International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering.
Pramudia E. 2008. Evaluasi Potensi Obyek Wisata Aktual Di Kabupaten Agam Sumatera Barat Untuk Perencanaan Program Pengembangan [tesis]. Institut Pertnian Bogor. Bogor.
Saaty TL. 1993. Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin, Proses Hierarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi Kompleks. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binaan Pressindo.
Skov PH dan Jensen FS. 2007. An Empirical Study of Recreational Route Choices. Finland: IUFRO Integrative Science for Integrative Management.
Solecki WD dan Welch JM. 1995. Urban parks: green spaces or green walls?. 32: 93—106. Landscape and Urban Planning.
Song J dan Nishimura Y. 2006. Urban Open-Space Plan for a Sustainable City: Aplication to the Tokyo Area.
Sundari ES. 2007. Studi Untuk Menentukan Fungsi Hutan Kota Dalam Masalah Lingkungan Perkotaan. 2 (2): 68—83. Bandung: Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota Unisba.
Rahayuningsih T. 2016. Membangun Model Perencanaan Wisata Alam Berbasis Spasial Di Bogor [tesis]. Institut Pertnian Bogor. Bogor.
Ter U. 2011. Quality criteria of urban parks: The case of Alaaddın Hill (Konya Turkey). African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(23): 5367—5376.
Tribe J dan Font X. 1999. Forest Tourism And Recreation Case Studies In Environmental Management. UK: CABI Publishing
Yi H. 2013. Trend of Parks and Open Spaces: Comparison of New York City and Seoul. Colombia University: Urban Planning.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nike
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Ruang: Jurnal Arsitektur agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
