Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor)
  • Scientific article do not contain substances of plagiarism. Articles submitted has never been published and not under consideration for publication in another journal or proceedings either in print or digital
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format. Conform to the standard of the Ruang: Jurnal Arsitektur template and the text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which are found in About the Journal. The length of the submitted paper is at least six pages and no more than 12 pages. Editors will evaluate if a paper needs more than 12 pages.
  • References expect a minimum of 20 references, primarily with a minimum of 80% to journal papers. It used a tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote for reference management and formatting and has chosen the IEEE style. If it is available, the URL for the references please to be included and be ascertained in inaccessible conditions.
  • If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.
  • If the author requests withdrawal of his/her manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the author will be punished as a withdrawal penalty to the publisher. However, it is unethical to withdraw a submitted manuscript from one journal if accepted by another journal.

Author Guidelines

The minimum standard requirements of the Ruang: Jurnal Arsitektur must be

  1. Written in Indonesian and English.
  2. The length of the submitted paper is at least six pages and no more than 20 pages. Editors will evaluate if an article is needing more than 20 pages.
  3. Use a tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote for reference management and formatting, and choose IEEE Style.
  4. Make sure that your paper is prepared using the RUANG paper template.

M. Structure of The Manuscript

The manuscript must be qualified and suggested present follow the structure:

  1. Title. The title of the paper should describe the research aims, method/model, and objective without an Acronym or abbreviation. Please provide a title that is concise and informative; ideally, it should contain no more than 20 words. Titles are often used in information-retrieval systems, so please keep in mind that your choice of title may impact how easily readers can discover your article.
  2. Keywords. Immediately after the abstract, provide a maximum of 5 keywords, using American spelling and avoiding general and plural terms and multiple concepts (avoid, for example, 'and', 'of'). Be sparing with abbreviations: only abbreviations firmly established in the field may be eligible. These keywords will be used for indexing purposes.
  3. Abstract. The abstract of your paper is a critical part of your manuscript; it plays a central role in the review process. The Abstract has a maximum of 250 WORDSNo citation. State in the abstract a primary goalresearch designmethodologymain outcomes and results, and conclusions.
  4. Section structure. Authors are suggested to present their articles in the section structure: Introduction - Method - Results and Discussion – Conclusion - Acknowledgments - References.
  • Introduction: State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background to explain the purpose and context, avoiding a detailed literature survey or a summary of the results. Provide a section that identifies how the work of the study relates to previous research studies and literature. This might be shown as a separate section or as part of the introduction or methodology, depending on the nature of the study. It is important to demonstrate the contribution made by the study to future studies' knowledge and, hence, the way in which it builds on or adds to previous work on the particular topic. In the case of Experimental Futures," the approach will depend on how changes in practice represented in the paper are conceptualized. The background literature can provide a basis for the conceptualization, for example, social structure, work, human experiences, socio-technological trends, design thinking, etc. In short communications, reference to previous research should be used to support the claims being made in the paper.
  • Method: Explain the conceptual basis of the research study, essay, or review and how it fits with the research questions and objectives of the study. Show how the methods used relate to this and what was done to generate new knowledge in a rigorous way. In the case of Experimental Futures, describe and explain the practices identified and how these practices are created (for instance, what is done, what technologies are used, what eco-system is involved). Explain how the practices have been sustained over time and have evolved from an idea or design to a practice. Make clear what is distinctive and 'new' about these practices. The tone of the paper should be critical reasoning and not advocacy.
  • Results and Discussion: Results of future research or foresight studies should be clear and concise. This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Demonstrate how the work reported in the paper, essay, or review contributes new knowledge. Show how the work links with existing literature, including future studies literature, avoiding over-elaborate citations. With regard to Experimental Futures, the discussion should explore the significance of the case. Typical questions might include: Why is it important? What alternative futures are envisaged or imagined from this case? What trends in societies might be driven or altered by it? What unintended consequences might be identified at this stage?
  • Conclusion: A brief explanation of the significance and implications of the work reported.
  • Acknowledgments: Collate acknowledgments in a separate section at the end of the article before the references and do not, therefore, include them on the title page as a footnote to the title or otherwise. List here those individuals who provided help during the research (e.g., providing language help, writing assistance proofreading the article, etc.). Any individuals who contributed to the manuscript but did not meet the authorship's necessary criteria should be acknowledged. Acknowledgments should be limited to those who helped extensively, such as providing statistical help, essential equipment, or translating references.
  • References. Expect a minimum of 30 references, primarily with a minimum of 80% to journal papers, and choose IEEE style. Please don't use unpredictable website sources. The use of DOI is highly encouraged.

Please contact info jurnalruanguntad@gmail.com for the problems.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.